Comments on: How to Change Runlevels (targets) in SystemD https://www.tecmint.com/change-runlevels-targets-in-systemd/ Tecmint - Linux Howtos, Tutorials, Guides, News, Tips and Tricks. Fri, 14 Jul 2023 01:59:46 +0000 hourly 1 By: Jan https://www.tecmint.com/change-runlevels-targets-in-systemd/comment-page-1/#comment-1922918 Thu, 01 Dec 2022 12:55:52 +0000 https://www.tecmint.com/?p=26619#comment-1922918 What’s the equivalent of run-level 2? i.e. multi-user, but no networking.

Troubleshooting some (probable) networking issues that prevent the server from fully booting. Normally I would boot into run-level 2, so I have multi-user, but without networking enabled.

]]>
By: Eric S https://www.tecmint.com/change-runlevels-targets-in-systemd/comment-page-1/#comment-1409108 Tue, 05 Jan 2021 01:44:15 +0000 https://www.tecmint.com/?p=26619#comment-1409108 There used to be a good GUI graphical interface for viewing enabling and disabling stuff on the various runlevels… what happened to that?

]]>
By: Tim Kissane https://www.tecmint.com/change-runlevels-targets-in-systemd/comment-page-1/#comment-1215316 Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:18:30 +0000 https://www.tecmint.com/?p=26619#comment-1215316 Thanks for the clear, concise explanation. It is needed and appreciated. However, I’m looking for a way to find the current target, not necessarily the same thing as the default target.

I’m writing a script using the runlevel man page as a guide. Some bright soul pointed out `who -r` gives the current run level (but not target). There should be an easier way (like get.target or similar).

Have I missed something? TIA.

]]>
By: Sam MM https://www.tecmint.com/change-runlevels-targets-in-systemd/comment-page-1/#comment-1100250 Sun, 10 Feb 2019 08:12:07 +0000 https://www.tecmint.com/?p=26619#comment-1100250 Thanks for the great details. It is really helpful.

]]>
By: Aaron Kili https://www.tecmint.com/change-runlevels-targets-in-systemd/comment-page-1/#comment-1084140 Wed, 19 Dec 2018 05:34:29 +0000 https://www.tecmint.com/?p=26619#comment-1084140 In reply to Pedro Bezunartea López.

@Pedro

Okay, thanks for the feedback.

]]>